Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 N.M. 401 - Murphy v. Murphy

Murphy v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2001

15 state decisions

80198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Heckathorn v. Heckathorn · Matter of Klecan · Wallace v. Wallace · Terry v. Terry · Evens v. Keller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There can be no doubt that the court could hold respondent in civil contempt of court for violating a court order that previously directed him to take certain action. * * * Nor is there any doubt that the judge could enforce such orders by * * * jail sentence. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.