State v. Santillanes’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently October 2010 · most notably State v. Ahasteen (1998), State v. Gonzales (1990)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oyler v. Boles · Ex parte Lange · State v. Gunzelman · State Ex Rel. Hovey Concrete Products Co. v. Mechem · State v. Lujan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“merely ... identifies circumstances permitting ordinary and interlocutory appeals.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Alingog · State v. Griffin“an aggrieved party shall have an absolute right to one appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Alingog · State v. Griffin“B. ... In any criminal proceeding in district court an appeal may be taken by the state to the supreme court or court of appeals, as appellate jurisdiction may be vested by law in these courts: (1) within thirty days from a decision, judgment or order dismissing a complaint, indictment or information as to any one or more counts; (2) within ten days from a decision or order of a district court suppressing or excluding evidence or requiring the return of seized property, if the district attorney certifies to the district court that the appeal is not taken for purpose of delay and that the evidence is a substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Armijo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.