Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 N.M. 511 - State v. Ulibarri

State v. Ulibarri’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
5
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Argersinger v. Hamlin · Burgett v. Texas · Scott v. Illinois · Lewis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We read Baldasar to mean that even if the enhanced offense is a misdemeanor with a light penalty, an accused may not be sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment unless he was afforded the benefit of assistance of counsel in the prior as well as the predicate offense. All instances where an enhancement follows a prior offense in which the defendant did not have the assistance of counsel in his defense are controlled by Baldasar . The fact of the prison term and not the gravity of the offense is the controlling criterion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.