State v. Turley’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 461
Relies on 8 Cal. 3d 247 - Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors · State Ex Rel. Newsome v. Alarid · City of Santa Fe v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. · State v. McHorse · Bokum Resources Corp. v. New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At trial, legislative intent * * * was sought to be established through the testimony of an individual senator and house member at the time of [the bill’s] passage. This court is not bound, and need not consider such evidence. Testimony of individual legislators or others as to happenings in the Legislature is incompetent, since that body speaks solely through its concerted action as shown by its vote.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.