State v. Crespin’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 district · 43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably State v. Keith (1985), State v. Handa (1995)
2 district · 43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Heckathorn v. Heckathorn · State v. Murray · McCutcheon v. Cox · State v. Allen · State v. Sublett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he court may continue or revoke the probation and may require the probationer to serve the balance of the sentence imposed or any lesser sentence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Even if defendant had waived his double jeopardy protection and had agreed to an increase in the length of his probation and to an increased penalty through changed conditions of probation, the result herein would not change. The fixing of penalties is a legislative function; the trial court’s authority is to impose a penalty which has been authorized by the Legislature; a penalty which has not been authorized is void. State v. Holland, 91 N.M. 386 , 574 P.2d 605 (Ct.App.1978); see McCutcheon v. Cox, 71 N.M. 274 , 377 P.2d 683 (1962); State v. Hovey, 87 N.M. 398 , 534 P.2d 777 (Ct.App.1975). The statutes cited in this opinion have not authorized a trial court to extend the length of probation or change the conditions of probation so as to increase the penalty even if a defendant is agreeable to such changes. (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Aguilar · State v. Chavez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.