Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 NY 100 - Morris v. . Talcott

Morris v. . Talcott’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1995 · most notably St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Johnston (1890), Lopez v. . Campbell (1900)

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 66 state decisions — followed in 10 states

410188418901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nichols v. . Pinner · Dambmann v. . Schulting · Jackson ex. rel. Cadwell v. King · Wright v. . Brown · Ward v. Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled in this State that an intent to defraud cannot be imputed to a party who contracts a debt knowing that he is insolvent, merely from the fact of his insolvency, and his omission upon a purchase of property upon credit to disclose such condition to his vendor. Nicholas v. Pinner, 18 N.Y. 295 ; [Nicholas v. Michael] 23 [N.Y.] 264; Wright v. Brown, 6.7 [N.Y.] [1], 9; People’s Bank [of City of New York] v. Bogart, 81 [N.Y.] [101], 108. A condition of known insolvency on the part of an intending purchaser of property, accompanied with an intention to acquire the property of his vendor without paying for it, constitutes such a fraud as will make the vendee liable to arrest in an action for the debt; but the intention not to pay can no more be inferred from the mere fact of insolvency, than the fact of insolvency can be inferred from the existence of an intention not to pay.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.