96 Ohio App. 3d 149 - State v. Crawley’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2020
5 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Blockburger v. United States · Griffith v. Kentucky · Marks v. United States · United States v. Dixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any statute which punishes as crime an act previously committed, which was innocent when done, which makes more burdensome the punishment for a crime, after its commission, or which deprives one charged with crime of any defense available according to law at the time when the act was committed....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kurzawa v. Jordan“[A]pplying Dixon retroactively would not act like an ex post facto law and would not violate appellee's right to due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kurzawa v. Jordan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.