Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 Ohio App. 3d 783 - Beekman v. Beekman

96 Ohio App. 3d 783 - Beekman v. Beekman’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 144 Ohio App. 3d 279 - Wilburn v. Wilburn (2001), 126 Ohio App. 3d 500 - Mitchell v. Mitchell (1998)

33 state decisions

1401994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · Miller v. Miller · Booth v. Booth · Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough a court grants one parent custody and the other visitation, the children need to know that they are loved by both parents regardless of the antagonism the parents might feel for each other. It is the duty of each parent to foster and encourage the child's love and respect for the other parent, and the failure from that duty is as harmful to the child as is the failure to provide food, clothing, or shelter. Perhaps it is more harmful because no matter how well fed or well clothed, a child cannot be happy if he or she feels unloved by one parent. {¶ 59}”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““We * * * find that unsubstantiated allegations of sexual abuse are a change of circumstances and may be grounds on which to modify a prior custody award.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.