Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

96 Ohio St. 3d 158

In re Doe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2002

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2002-07-31

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2002

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-07-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

¶1concurring in part and dissenting in part.

¶2{¶ 2} I agree with the majority that the applicant should be permitted to reapply for the February 2003 bar examination. However, I disagree with the majority’s decision to order that the record of proceedings in this case be sealed, since all matters of this nature should be open to the public.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.
/96/ohiost3d/158 · .json · Public domain