In re Maloney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2002

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2002-08-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 2005

2 state decisions

Relies on In re Bicknell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-08-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1{¶ 1} Oral argument is cancelled.

¶2{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re Bicknell, 96 Ohio St.3d 76, 2002-0hio-3615, 771 N.E.2d 846.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., would order the parties to show cause why this cause should not be decided on the authority of In re Bicknell.Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.