In re Cross’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably In re A.J.S. (2008), In re S.J. (2005)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gault · Kent v. United States · Breed v. Jones · In re Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the completion of probation signals the end of the court's jurisdiction over a delinquent juvenile.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] juvenile court does not have the jurisdiction to reimpose a suspended commitment to a Department of Youth Services facility after a juvenile has been released from probation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hen the court ended Cross's probation, it ended its ability to make further dispositions as to Cross on that delinquency count.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.