Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 OHIOST3D 384 - State v. Miller

State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

131 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably State v. Fry (2010), State v. Walker (Slip Opinion) (2016)

131 state decisions

710200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Apanovitch · State v. Reynolds · State v. Awkal · State v. O'Neal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reverse a judgment of a trial court on the weight of the evidence, when the judgment results from a trial by jury, a unanimous concurrence of all three judges on the court of appeals panel reviewing the case is required.”
    61 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]o reverse a judgment of a trial court on the basis that the judgment is not sustained by sufficient evidence, only a concurring majority of a panel of a court of appeals reviewing the judgment is necessary.”
    58 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(B) A person acts knowingly, regardless of his purpose, when he is aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature. A person has knowledge of circumstances when he is aware that such circumstances probably exist.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.