Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 OHIOST3D 94 - State v. Cassano

State v. Cassano’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

216
cited by 216 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

210 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 216 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Hale (2008), State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion) (2016)

210 state decisions

1100200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Olano · Faretta v. California · State v. Jenks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 216 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Reversals of convictions on ineffective assistance requires the defendant to show `first that counsel's performance was deficient and, second that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense so as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a defendant in a state criminal trial has an independent constitutional right of self-representation and * * * may proceed to defend himself without counsel when he voluntarily, and knowingly and intelligently elects to do so.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[w]here evidence adduced at trial reveals the presence of sufficient time and opportunity for the planning of an act of homicide to constitute prior calculation, and the circumstances surrounding the homicide show a scheme designed to implement the calculated decision to kill, a finding by the trier of fact of prior calculation and design is justified.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.