Davidson v. Finley’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Inasmuch as garnishment proceedings are creations of the statutes and therefore only such rights are granted as are expressly conferred by statutes, we must look to the statutes of this state to ascertain what jurisdiction, if any, the district, court of Tulsa county had in the instant case.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. First Nat. Bank of Healdton v. Halback

2. ““There is a distinct kind of garnishment, known as garnishment upon judgment or in aid of execution, in which the judgment is the direct basis of the writ, and which issues upon the judgment in somewhat the same manner as an execution and in immediate aid or in lieu thereof.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. First Nat. Bank of Cordell v. City Guaranty Bank of Hobart

3. ““Garnishment is practically only an equitable execution brought for the purpose of reaching nonleviable assets.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. First Nat. Bank of Cordell v. City Guaranty Bank of Hobart