Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 Okla. 59 - Herron v. Miller

Herron v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
6
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably 142 F. Supp. 354 - Sorensen v. the Overland Corporation (1956), Prince v. Leesona Corp. (1983)

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

901923193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Atlantic & Pacific Railroad v. Laird · Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Higgs · Atlantio Ry Co v. Laird · Canaday v. United Railways Co. · Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Akin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 190, Comp.St.1921, providing that, where an action which has been commenced within due time fails otherwise than on its merits, a new action may be commenced within one year after such failure, refers to actions which have been commenced within this state within due time, and have failed otherwise than upon the merits; but the statute has no application to actions which have been commenced within other states and have failed otherwise than upon the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If in an action commenced in due time, a judgment for the plaintiff be reversed, or if the plaintiff fail otherwise than upon the merits, and the time limited for the commencement of such action has at the date of such reversal or failure expired, the plaintiff * * * may commence a new action within one year after such date, * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.