Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

96 So. 2d 668

Martin v. Kendall

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 12, 1957

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1957-08-12

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1986

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1957-08-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We have examined the record and briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral *669argument at the bar of this Court. From our perusal of the record we reached the conclusion that the jury verdict was arrived at in this case upon consideration of conflicting evidence and should not be disturbed.

¶2The record holds evidence sufficient to sustain the jury’s finding of negligence on the part of the defendant, and no useful purpose would be served by restating the evidence in detail in this opinion. Accordingly, the appellant’s contention that the Court erred in refusing to grant a directed verdict is rejected.

¶3Affirmed.

CHAS. CARROLL, C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
/96/so2d/668 · .json · Public domain