Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 SO3D 989 - Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 304 So. 2d 97 - SLT Warehouse Company v. Webb · 837 So. 2d 371 - Caufield v. Cantele · White v. State · Gowins v. State · State v. Rudolf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n order which denies a claim in a postconviction motion and grants an evi- dentiary hearing on a different claim in the same motion is not appealable until all issues raised have been ruled upon by the court.... An order denying in part and granting in part relief, however, marks the end of the judicial labor which is to be expended on the motion, and the order is final for appellate purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.