Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

96 S.W.3d 119

Wells v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 2003

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2003-01-31

Decided 2003-01-31

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2John Wells appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his motion, Mr. Wells sought to vacate his convictions for burglary in the second degree, section 569.170, RSMo 2000, and stealing, section 570.030, RSMo 2000, and concurrent sentences of ten and seven years imprisonment, respectively. He claims on appeal that the motion court erred in denying his motion because trial counsel was ineffective for failing to make a motion requesting the trial judge to recuse himself from the case. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

/96/sw3d/119 · .json · Public domain