Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 SW3D 24 - Commonwealth v. Hale

Commonwealth v. Hale’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on County of Sacramento v. Lewis · Washington v. Glucksberg · Frisbie v. Collins · Ker v. People of the State of Illinois · Ponzi v. Fessenden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Tjhis harsh remedy ... is a relic that has outlived its usefulness. While the forfeiture rule may have had a place as a prophylactic measure designed to prevent regression in the midst of a paradigmatic change in correctional philosophy, we can discern no similarly compelling reason for a forfeiture rule in the 21st Century.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.