Arthur v. Herman’s Empirical Analysis
96 U.S. 141 · 1877
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
December 1889
most recently cited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ Cotton braids, insertings, lace, trimming, or bobbinet, and all other manufactures of cotton, not otherwise provided for, thirty-five per centum ad valorem.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arthur v. Fox“certain cheap goqds, the warp of which was made of cotton' and the .filling or woof of cattle hair,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Arthur v. Fox
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.