Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 U.S. 245 - McLean v. Fleming

McLean v. Fleming’s Empirical Analysis

96 U.S. 245 · 1877

Citation profile

961
cited by 961 later decisions
37
cited 37 times by the Supreme Court
30
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

302 federal appellate · 126 district · 151 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 961 later decisions (37 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios Inc (1984), Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Metcalf (1916)

302 federal appellate · 126 district · 151 state decisions — followed in 30 states

12101877188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gorham Company v. White · Canal Company v. Clark · Sullivan v. Portland and Kennebec Railroad Company · Meneely v. . Meneely

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 961 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “What degree of resemblance is necessary to constitute an infringement is incapable of exact definition, as applicable to all cases. All that courts of justice can do, in that regard, is to say that no trader can adopt a trade-mark so resembling that of another trader, as that ordinary purchasers, buying with ordinary caution are likely to be misled.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A court of equity will not interfere when ordinary attention by tbe purchaser of an article would enable him at once to discriminate one from the other.””
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““If the form, marks, contents, words, or the special arrangement of the same, or the general appearance of the alleged infringer’s device, is such as will be likely to mislead one in the ordinary course of purchasing the goods, and induce him to suppose he was purchasing the genuine article, then the similitude is such as entitles the injured party to equitable protection.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.