Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 U.S. 279 - Conrad v. Waples

Conrad v. Waples’s Empirical Analysis

96 U.S. 279 · 1877

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
16
cited 16 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 1927
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (16 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1927 · most notably Central Union Trust Co of New York v. Garvan Merrill (1921), United States v. American Bell Telephone Co. (1888)

4 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

80187718801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Corbett v. Nutt · Ellis v. Prevost · Kershaw v. Kelsey · Flynn v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Respecting the power of government no doubt is entertained. . . . When the sovereign ■authority shall choose to bring it into operation, the judicial department must' give effect to its will. ■ But until that will shall be expressed, no power of condemnation can exist in the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.