Haynes v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2012
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Triplett v. . Williams · 24 Cal. App. 193 - Forgeus v. County of Santa Cruz · Robinson v. Missisquoi R. R. · Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis · Lee v. Barefoot
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are not interested in the use of terms but we are in concepts, relationships and legal rights which for convenience are often described by the use of legal names or expressions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The description of the property for grant of a fee is complete without this clause, and unless the clause is used to limit or qualify the grant it can serve no purpose whatsoever.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“). 13 . See Haynes v. Hunt, 96 Utah 348 , 85 P.2d 861, 864 (1939) ('The language ... 'hereby convey and warrant' normally implies a grant of the fee. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.