96 Wash. App. 25 - State v. Pray’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “as: Personal presence at some place of abode with no present intention of definite and early removal and with purpose to remain for undetermined period ... but not necessarily combined with design to stay permanently. BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY at 1308-09 (Sixth Edition 1990). In State v. Pickett, 95 Wash.App. 475 , 975 P.2d 584 (1999), the court found that a homeless convicted sex offender did not have a”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Pray

2. “residence arrangement triggers the registration requirement. We disagree. Under the definitions above, a temporary habitation may be a residence. Pray abandoned his residence in Seattle, and had indefinite though temporary living arrangements. Based on the evidence, a rational trier of fact could find that Pray established a”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Pray

3. “1 a the act or fact of abiding or dwelling in a place for some time ... 2 a (1) the place where one actually lives ... (2) a temporary or permanent dwelling place, abode or habitation to which one intends to return as distinguished from a place of temporary sojourn or transient visit.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Pray