96 Wash. App. 839 - State v. Johnstone’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 119 Wash. 2d 167 - State v. Johnson · 125 Wash. 2d 782 - State v. Vangerpen · 107 Wash. 2d 346 - State v. Knapstad · 119 Wash. 2d 143 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e do not attempt to find the missing elements by construing the wording of the document.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Borrero · State v. Khlee“those facts the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to establish that the defendant committed the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Khlee“[T]he language must not be `inartful or vague' in setting out the elements of the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Borrero
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.