Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 WIS 158 - Docter v. Riedel

Docter v. Riedel’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
13
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2003

14 state decisions — followed in 13 states

30189719001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Phelps v. . Nowlen · Snydacker v. Brosse · Raycroft v. Tayntor · Casey v. Hanrick · Schley v. Schofield & Son

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the process has been used to accomplish some unlawful end, or to compel the defendant to do some collateral thing which he could not legally be compelled to do.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.