96 Wis. 2d 1 - Schroeder v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

cited by 23 later decisions

states following

July 2009

most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2009

23 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Ohio · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Maloney · 53 Wis. 2d 218 - Bautista v. State · 24 Wis. 2d 527 - State v. Nutley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“is totally incapable of committing the substantive crime”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 154 Wis. 2d 298 - In Interest of Cg · 154 Wis. 2d 298 - C.G. v. State
““. . . does not create a substantive offense by itself, [but] it does create a substantive offense when charged in conjunction with an underlying crime. Thus, as we said in Haldane , a conviction for violating secs. 943.32 (1) (b) and (2) [armed robbery] and 946.62 [concealing identity] is not a conviction of two separate crimes but only the one crime of armed and masked robbery. It is this offense which the defendant in this case was found to have committed as a party to a crime. The fact that two verdicts of guilty were returned for [the one count charging violations of both statutes] does not mean the defendant was convicted of two crimes ... . The second verdict . . . only found an additional aggravating factor.” Schroeder, supra at 7 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 102 Wis. 2d 343 - Robinson v. State
““946.62 Concealing identity. Whoever commits a crime while his usual appearance has been concealed, disguised or altered, with intent to make it less likely that he will be identified with the crime, may in addition to the maximum 'punishment fixed for such crime, in case of conviction for a misdemeanor be imprisoned not to exceed one year in county jail, and in case of conviction for a felony be imprisoned not to exceed 5 years.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 108 Wis. 2d 282 - State v. Morris

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.