Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 Wis. 2d 272 - State v. Doyle

96 Wis. 2d 272 - State v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2006 · most notably 164 Wis. 2d 437 - State v. Swanson (1991), State v. Williams (2001)

30 state decisions

180198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Carroll v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Brinegar v. United States · Draper v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When faced with information received from a citizen informant, Wisconsin holds that the test for reliability shifts-from a question of personal reliability to 'observational' reliability. A citizen informant's reliability must be evaluated from the nature of his report, his opportunity to hear and see the matter reported, and the extent to which it can be verified by an independent investigation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 225 Wis. 2d 159 - State v. Williams · 2006 WI App 261 - State v. Kolk
  2. “(1) his ability or freedom of movement is restricted, (2) the arresting officer intends, at that time, to restrain the person, and (3) the person under arrest believes or understands he is in custody.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 103 Wis. 2d 203 - State v. Goebel · 134 Wis. 2d 108 - State v. Washington
  3. “. . . there must be some type of evaluation of the reliability of victim and witness informants, although the standard to be applied is much less stringent:”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 102 Wis. 2d 367 - State v. Cheers · 2006 WI App 261 - State v. Kolk

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.