96 Wis. 2d 531 - State v. Shaffer’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
116 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 120 later decisions — most recently December 2009 · most notably State v. Pettit (1992), 137 Wis. 2d 397 - Ford Motor Co. v. Lyons (1987)
116 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Michigan v. Mosley · Gray v. United States · Isaacs v. United States · 94 Wis. 2d 450 - Muller v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is inadequate and ... [i]n the future this court will refuse to consider such an argument, or summarily affirm on the issue.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) The brief must contain: (e) An argument arranged in the order of the statement of issues presented. The argument on each issue must be preceded by a one sentence summary of the argument and is to contain the contention of the appellant, the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on as set forth in the Uniform System of Citation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the age of the suspect; (2) the suspect's education and intelligence; (3) the suspect's physical and emotional condition; (4) whether the suspect has had prior experience with the police; (5) whether the suspect was apprised of his rights; (6) whether the suspect requested counsel and the response to any such request; (7) the length and condition of the interrogation; and (8) any physical or psychological pressures, inducements, methods or strategems used by the police to obtain the incriminating statement or confession from the suspect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.