United States v. Olvera-Cervantes’s Empirical Analysis
960 F.2d 101 · 1992
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3559 · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Hill · United States v. Aymelek · United States v. Smith · United States v. Aichele
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the sentencing court must enhance a defendant's presumptively applicable sentencing range if it finds that the defendant was originally deported after sustaining a felony conviction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a conviction under a statute, state or federal, with a statutory maximum penalty in excess of one year”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.