Saltany v. Bush’s Empirical Analysis
960 F.2d 1060 · 1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2011
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · White v. United States · Owen v. Owen · Carpa, Inc. v. Ward Foods, Inc. · Browning v. Navarro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not an appropriate substitute for the findings required by Rule 11,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hollister v. Soetoro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.