In Re Wallace J Kaminski’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 10 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2020
4 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Nixon · Linda R. S. v. Richard D. · Holt v. Alleghany Corp. · Barrett v. Zweibon · United States v. Cox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] judge should not recuse himself based upon conclusory, unsupported or tenuous allegations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because ... Congress intended to preclude review at the behest of private citizens.... Congress did not intend to create procedural rights in private citizens sufficient to support standing to sue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the executive branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.