Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 F.2d 1112 - United States v. Pitre

United States v. Pitre’s Empirical Analysis

960 F.2d 1112 · 1992

Citation profile

235
cited by 235 later decisions
5
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

122 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 235 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably United States v. Sepulveda (1993), United States v. Salameh (1998)

122 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

10201992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Glasser v. United States · Doyle v. Ohio · Moran v. Burbine · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 235 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]vidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith,”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] conspiracy by its very nature is a secretive operation,”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Prior act evidence may be admitted to inform the jury of the background of the conspiracy charged, to complete the story of the crimes charged, and to help explain to the jury how the illegal relationship between participants in the crime developed.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.