United States v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
960 F.2d 115 · 1992
Citation profile
23 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 2011 · most notably United States v. Dixon (1992), United States v. Bates (2000)
23 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on King v. Lynaugh · Wrenn v. Benson · United States v. Smith · United States v. Mims · United States v. Martinez-Jimenez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]lthough the gun carried by [defendant] was a plastic gun, the Sentencing Guidelines indicate that an object that appeared to be a dangerous weapon [should be treated] as a dangerous weapon”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“intentionally created the appearance that he possessed a dangerous weapon, he told his victim he had a gun, and the victim reasonably believed that [he] was armed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This is a hold up. I have a gun in the waistband of my pants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.