Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 F.2d 1187 - No. 91-3476

No. 91-3476’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2017

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

80199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. Bruch · Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security · Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney · 111 S. Ct. 425 - Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is undisputed that prejudgment interest typically is granted to make a plaintiff whole because the defendant may wrongfully benefit from the plaintiff's money.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · 22 Employee Benefits Cas 2169 Pens Plan Guide P 23950a
  2. “(1) the offending parties’ culpability or bad faith; (2) the ability of the offending parties to satisfy an award of attorney’s fees; (3) the deterrent effect of an award of attorney’s fees against the offending party; (4) the benefit conferred on members of the plan as a whole; and (5) the relative merits of the parties’ positions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Pilieri v. Continental Casualty Co. · McPherson v. Employees' Pension Plan of American Re-Insurance Co.
  3. “offering no explanation for its decision to award attorney's fees”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re Joseph Gioioso Carol Jean Gioioso, Debtors. Chester J. Stuebben Westfield Home News Service, Inc. v. Joseph Gioioso Carol Jean Gioioso · Gioioso

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.