United States v. Webster’s Empirical Analysis
960 F.2d 1301 · 1992
Citation profile
62 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably United States v. Puig-Infante (1994), United States v. Pofahl (1993)
62 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Leon · Tanner v. United States · Jizmejian v. United States · National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Idaho
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]vidence of a differential between [a drug dealer's] legitimate income and cash outflow is sufficient for a money-laundering conviction, even when the defendant claims income from additional sources”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) If the issuing magistrate/judge was misled by information in an affidavit that the affiant knew was false or would have known except for reckless disregard of the truth; (2) where the issuing magistrate/judge wholly abandoned his or her judicial role; (3) where the warrant is based on an affidavit so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in its existence entirely unreasonable; and (4) where the warrant is so facially deficient in failing to particularize the place to be searched or the things to be seized that the executing officers cannot reasonably presume it to be valid.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he basis for searching [the defendant's] residence was his overall drug trafficking and sales activity, not just those sales that actually took place at his residence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.