Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

960 F.2d 145

Docket No. 92-6143.

Emerson v. State

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 6, 1992 Decided: April 21, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-04-21

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Craig Elam v. United States

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-04-21

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Carl Louis Emerson-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Cathleen C. Brockmeyer, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Carl Louis Emerson appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Emerson v. State of Maryland, No. CA-91-1739-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 27, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/960/f2d/145 · .json · Public domain