Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

960 F.2d 147

Docket No. 91-7668.

United States v. Kyle

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: November 21, 1991 Decided: April 23, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-04-23

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Lorenzo A. Scorpio v. Richard L. Huff

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-04-23

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-78-491, CA-90-205-MJG)

Samuel Brown Kyle, appellant pro se.

Ira Lee Oring, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Samuel Brown Kyle appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kyle, Nos. CR-78-491, CA-90-205-MJG (D. Md. June 21, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/960/f2d/147 · .json · Public domain