Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 F.2d 278 - United States v. Edwards

United States v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

960 F.2d 278 · 1992

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 2014
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2014 · most notably Reno v. Koray (1995), Dawson v. Scott (1995)

33 federal appellate · 1 district ·

410199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3013 · 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3585 · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee · Department of the Treasury v. Federal Labor Relations Authority · Frates v. Weinshienk · United States v. Klein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The interpretation of a federal statute is a question of law which we review de novo.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A defendant shall be given credit toward the service of a term of imprisonment for any time he has spent in official detention prior to the date the sentence commences....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.