Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 F.2d 426 - United States v. Stone

United States v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis

960 F.2d 426 · 1992

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably United States v. Cantwell (2006), United States v. Mergerson (1993)

51 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

370199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · Brewster v. Derwinski · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Lowenfield v. Phelps · Morrison v. Olson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is not necessary that the evidence exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[P]oor quality and partial unintelligibility do not render tapes inadmissible unless the unintelligible portions are so substantial as to render the recording as a whole untrustworthy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “... upon independent examination, the district court is convinced that the `recording accurately reproduces the auditory experience.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.