Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 F.2d 486 - Moore Business Forms, Inc. v. Ryu

Moore Business Forms, Inc. v. Ryu’s Empirical Analysis

960 F.2d 486 · 1992

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Pebble Beach Company v. Tour I Limited Resorts of Pinehurst Incorporated (1998), Seven-Up Co. v. Coca-Cola Co. (1996)

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

3901992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · Democratic Party of the United States v. Wisconsin ex rel. La Follette · Amstar Corporation v. Domino's Pizza Inc · Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp. v. Diversified Packaging Corp. · Exxon Corporation v. Texas Motor Exchange of Houston Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he interplay of[§ 1117(a) and § 1117(b) ] demonstrates that a showing of intent or bad faith is unnecessary to ... seek remedies pursuant to § 1117(a).” However, because the Fifth Circuit has rejected Chanel in part by holding that an exceptional case requires a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An exceptional case is one where the violative acts can be characterized as malicious, fraudulent, deliberate, or willful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “should not, without more, be considered exceptional.” The”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.