United States v. Harry’s Empirical Analysis
960 F.2d 51 · 1992
Citation profile
43 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably United States v. Adipietro (1993), United States v. Tejada-Beltran (1995)
43 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · United States v. Preakos · United States v. Johnson · United States v. Collar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the defendant was an organizer or leader of a criminal activity that involved five or more participants or was otherwise extensive.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the exercise of decision making authority, the nature of participation in the commission of the offense, the recruitment of accomplices, the claimed right to a larger share of the fruits of the crime, the degree of participation in planning or organizing the offense, the nature and scope of the illegal activity, and the degree of control and authority exercised over others.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.