Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 F.2d 543 - Parker v. Ryan

Parker v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis

960 F.2d 543 · 1992

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Anderson v. Davila (1997), United States v. Microsoft Corp. (1998)

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

2001992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 · Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean Society · Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Idaho v. Wright · Miami Center Ltd. Partnership v. Bank of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]ompliance with Rule 65(a)(1) is mandatory,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[n]o preliminary injunction shall be issued without notice to the adverse party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The notice required by Rule 65(a) before a preliminary injunction can issue implies a hearing in which the [opposing party] is given a fair opportunity to oppose the application and to prepare for such opposition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.