Arcor, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
960 F.2d 710 · 1992
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on 46 Ill. App. 3d 350 - Burrus v. Itek Corp. · 137 Ill. App. 3d 773 - Hollembaek v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc. · Fort Howard Paper Company v. Standard Havens Inc · Canada Dry Corporation v. Nehi Beverage Company, Inc. Of Indianapolis · 154 Ill. App. 3d 438 - Alguire v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Improper statements during closing arguments warrant reversal only if they 'influenced the jury in such a way that substantial prejudice resulted to' the opposing party.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“seller has actual knowledge of the product's failure based on the seller's own observations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.