Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 F.2d 721 - Chutich v. Touche Ross & Co.

Chutich v. Touche Ross & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

960 F.2d 721 · 1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 1993
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston · Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green · Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether federal courts may imply a private right to contribution in Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities & Exchange Commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.