Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 F.2d 763 - Taylor v. Carter

Taylor v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

960 F.2d 763 · 1992

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2018

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

100199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Mitchell v. Forsyth · Kennedy v. City of Cleveland · Fisichelli v. City Known as the Town of Methuen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “merely reasserted arguments raised unsuccessfully in previous motions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “repeatedly file[d] the same motion with a district court”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a dilatory defendant would receive not only his allotted bite at the apple, but an invitation to gnaw at will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.