Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 F.2d 925 - Clisby v. Jones

Clisby v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

960 F.2d 925 · 1992

Citation profile

210
cited by 210 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 210 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2022 · most notably Brewer v. Reynolds (1995), Goodwin v. Johnson (1997)

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

8201992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Coleman v. Thompson · Teague v. Lane · Lockett v. Ohio · Rose v. Lundy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 210 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ake requires a state to provide the capital defendant with such access to a competent psychiatrist upon a preliminary showing to the trial court that the defendant's mental status is to be a significant factor at sentencing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “deep concern over the piecemeal litigation of federal habeas petitions filed by state prisoners”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[FJirst [we] examine the information before the trial court when it is alleged to have deprived the defendant of due process .... We then determine whether that information should have led the trial court to conclude that the defendant would probably not receive a fair trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.