Paydon v. Hawk’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Turner v. Safley · Sandin v. Conner · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Collins v. Youngblood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Third Circuit has affirmed the district court’s decision in Litman, in which Judge Rodriguez explicitly held that the determination that “a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1) constitutes a ‘crime of violence’ [within the meaning of § 924(c) ] is within the discretion of the Bureau of Prisons.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n no way redefines any crime, increases any punishment, or in any way deprives Petitioner of any rights which he had prior to its enactment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Minnema v. Pitzer“atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life” or creates a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.