State v. TEH’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2019
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · State v. Alvarez · 117 Wash. 2d 211 - State v. Grewe · 92 Wash. 2d 755 - State v. Rhodes · State v. Maupin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because without such a showing, the touching may be inadvertent. The court concluded that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding of sexual gratification,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lorenz“[T.E.H.] forced [victim] to disrobe and intentionally molested him with his hands and his body, including his penis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lorenz“the findings and conclusions contain[ed] no finding of the ultimate facts relied upon by the juvenile court”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lorenz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.