Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 SO2D 266 - State v. Ragas

State v. Ragas’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · 839 So. 2d 1 - State v. Smith · Epps v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not limited to those instrumentalities which are inherently dangerous, but includes any instrumentality which in the manner used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm. State v. Bonier, 367 So.2d 824, 826 (La.1979); See also State in the Interest of Ruschel, 411 So.2d 1216 (La. App. 4 Cir.1982); State v. Ragas, 2007-3 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/15/07), 960 So.2d 266 . Moreover, it is well established that the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.